On 05/17/2018 02:20 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 5:13 AM Ursula Braun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> This problem should no longer show up with yesterday's net-next commit
>> 569bc6436568 ("net/smc: no tx work trigger for fallback sockets").
>
> It definitely triggers on latest net-next, which includes 569bc6436568
>
> Thanks.
>
Sorry, my fault.
Your proposed patch solves the problem. On the other hand the purpose of
smc_tx_init() has been to cover tx-related socket initializations needed for
connection sockets only. tx_work is something that should be scheduled only
for active connection sockets in non-fallback mode.
Thus I prefer this alternate patch to solve the problem:
---
net/smc/af_smc.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -1362,14 +1362,18 @@ static int smc_setsockopt(struct socket
}
break;
case TCP_NODELAY:
- if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) {
+ if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+ sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+ sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
if (val && !smc->use_fallback)
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &smc->conn.tx_work,
0);
}
break;
case TCP_CORK:
- if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT && sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN) {
+ if (sk->sk_state != SMC_INIT &&
+ sk->sk_state != SMC_LISTEN &&
+ sk->sk_state != SMC_CLOSED) {
if (!val && !smc->use_fallback)
mod_delayed_work(system_wq, &smc->conn.tx_work,
0);
What do you think?
