On 05/17/2018 08:40 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On 05/17/2018 08:14 AM, Neal Cardwell wrote:

>> Any particular motivation for the 2.5ms here? It might be nice to match the
>> existing TSO autosizing dynamics and use 1ms here instead of having a
>> separate new constant of 2.5ms. Smaller time scales here should lead to
>> less burstiness and queue pressure from data packets in the network, and we
>> know from experience that the CPU overhead of 1ms chunks is acceptable.
> This came from my tests on wifi really :)
> I also had the idea to make this threshold adjustable for wifi, like we did 
> for sk_pacing_shift.
> (On wifi, we might want to increase the max delay between ACK)
> So maybe use 1ms delay, when sk_pacing_shift == 10, but increase it if 
> sk_pacing_shift has been lowered.

BTW, maybe my changelog or patch is not clear enough :

As soon as some packets are received in order, we send an ACK, even if the 
timer was armed.
(This is the beginning of __tcp_ack_snd_check())

When this ACK is sent, timer is canceled (in tcp_event_ack_sent())

Reply via email to