On 05/21/2018 11:08 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > On 05/21/2018 10:35 AM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> Ah yes, sequence number wrapping. I was thinking I needed to deal with >> that, and then got sidetracked and forgot about it. Will fix. >> >> Other than that, do you agree that this approach to SACK and header >> handling can work? > > Unfortunately this does not handle dsack (RFC 2883, and 3708) properly, I > believe. >
Since I will be traveling for the next ~10 days, with possibly no Internet access, or time to review patches, please CC other Google TCP experts for the next versions. Thanks.
