On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:47 AM, John Fastabend
<john.fastab...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In selftest test_maps the sockmap test case attempts to add a socket
> in listening state to the sockmap. This is no longer a valid operation
> so it fails as expected. However, the test wrongly reports this as an
> error now. Fix the test to avoid adding sockets in listening state.
>
> Fixes: 945ae430aa44 ("bpf: sockmap only allow ESTABLISHED sock state")
I cannot reproduce the failure and I cannot find the above "Fixes" commit.
I checked latest bpf/bpf-next/net-next trees. Maybe I missed something?
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastab...@gmail.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> index 6c25334..9fed5f0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data)
> }
>
> /* Test update without programs */
> - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
> + for (i = 2; i < 6; i++) {
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &i, &sfd[i], BPF_ANY);
> if (err) {
> printf("Failed noprog update sockmap '%i:%i'\n",
> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static void test_sockmap(int tasks, void *data)
> }
>
> /* Test map update elem afterwards fd lives in fd and map_fd */
> - for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
> + for (i = 2; i < 6; i++) {
> err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd_rx, &i, &sfd[i], BPF_ANY);
> if (err) {
> printf("Failed map_fd_rx update sockmap %i '%i:%i'\n",
>
