On Fri, 2018-06-15 at 20:49 +0000, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote: > > > That does end up being quite hairy. I don't think it's worth doing. > > > > This should probably suffice to fix it... > > > > Kevin this is going to conflict with the ifx_atm_alloc_skb() hack in > > the tree you're working on, but that needs to be killed with fire > > anyway. It's utterly pointless as discussed. > > I had already done so as part of the last pastebin debug info round :-) > > As regards your patch… MAGIC! Works an absolute treat. Will get > that submitted along with the ‘nuke ifx_atm_alloc_skb’ patch to > OpenWrt tomorrow. For now, maybe my brain will let me sleep :-) > > Thank you soooooo much for your help & patience. > > Tested-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <l...@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
Thanks. In the morning please could I trouble you to test the other variants that you can manage — PPPoA with llc-encap, as well as br2684 and PPPoE over that?
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
