> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doron Roberts-Kedes [mailto:doro...@fb.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 6:00 AM
> To: David S . Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Dave Watson <davejwat...@fb.com>; Vakul Garg
> <vakul.g...@nxp.com>; Boris Pismenny <bor...@mellanox.com>; Aviad
> Yehezkel <avia...@mellanox.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Doron
> Roberts-Kedes <doro...@fb.com>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next] net/tls: Calculate nsg for zerocopy path without
> skb_cow_data.
> 
> decrypt_skb fails if the number of sg elements required to map is greater
> than MAX_SKB_FRAGS. As noted by Vakul Garg, nsg must always be
> calculated, but skb_cow_data adds unnecessary memcpy's for the zerocopy
> case.
> 
> The new function skb_nsg calculates the number of scatterlist elements
> required to map the skb without the extra overhead of skb_cow_data. This
> function mimics the structure of skb_to_sgvec.
> 
> Fixes: c46234ebb4d1 ("tls: RX path for ktls")
> Signed-off-by: Doron Roberts-Kedes <doro...@fb.com>
> ---
>  net/tls/tls_sw.c | 89
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c index
> ff3a6904a722..c62793601cfc 100644
> --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,76 @@
> 
>  #define MAX_IV_SIZE  TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_IV_SIZE
> 
> +static int __skb_nsg(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len,
> +                unsigned int recursion_level)
> +{
> +        int start = skb_headlen(skb);
> +        int i, copy = start - offset;
> +        struct sk_buff *frag_iter;
> +        int elt = 0;
> +
> +        if (unlikely(recursion_level >= 24))
> +                return -EMSGSIZE;
> +
> +        if (copy > 0) {
> +                if (copy > len)
> +                        copy = len;
> +                elt++;
> +                if ((len -= copy) == 0)
> +                        return elt;
> +                offset += copy;
> +        }
> +
> +        for (i = 0; i < skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags; i++) {
> +                int end;
> +
> +                WARN_ON(start > offset + len);
> +
> +                end = start + skb_frag_size(&skb_shinfo(skb)->frags[i]);
> +                if ((copy = end - offset) > 0) {
> +                        if (copy > len)
> +                                copy = len;
> +                        elt++;
> +                        if (!(len -= copy))
> +                                return elt;
> +                        offset += copy;
> +                }
> +                start = end;
> +        }
> +
> +        skb_walk_frags(skb, frag_iter) {
> +                int end, ret;
> +
> +                WARN_ON(start > offset + len);
> +
> +                end = start + frag_iter->len;
> +                if ((copy = end - offset) > 0) {
> +
> +                        if (copy > len)
> +                                copy = len;
> +                        ret = __skb_nsg(frag_iter, offset - start, copy,
> +                                     recursion_level + 1);
> +                        if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> +                                return ret;
> +                        elt += ret;
> +                        if ((len -= copy) == 0)
> +                                return elt;
> +                        offset += copy;
> +                }
> +                start = end;
> +        }
> +        BUG_ON(len);
> +        return elt;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the number of scatterlist elements required to completely map
> +the
> + * skb, or -EMSGSIZE if the recursion depth is exceeded.
> + */
> +static int skb_nsg(struct sk_buff *skb, int offset, int len) {
> +     return __skb_nsg(skb, offset, len, 0); }
> +

These is generic function and useful elsewhere too.
Should the above two functions be exported by skbuff.c?

>  static int tls_do_decryption(struct sock *sk,
>                            struct scatterlist *sgin,
>                            struct scatterlist *sgout,
> @@ -693,7 +763,7 @@ int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>       struct scatterlist sgin_arr[MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 2];
>       struct scatterlist *sgin = &sgin_arr[0];
>       struct strp_msg *rxm = strp_msg(skb);
> -     int ret, nsg = ARRAY_SIZE(sgin_arr);
> +     int ret, nsg;
>       struct sk_buff *unused;
> 
>       ret = skb_copy_bits(skb, rxm->offset + TLS_HEADER_SIZE, @@ -
> 704,10 +774,23 @@ int decrypt_skb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> 
>       memcpy(iv, tls_ctx->rx.iv, TLS_CIPHER_AES_GCM_128_SALT_SIZE);
>       if (!sgout) {
> -             nsg = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &unused) + 1;
> +             nsg = skb_cow_data(skb, 0, &unused);
> +     } else {
> +             nsg = skb_nsg(skb,
> +                           rxm->offset + tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size,
> +                           rxm->full_len - tls_ctx->rx.prepend_size);
> +             if (nsg <= 0)
> +                     return nsg;
Comparison should be (nsg < 1). TLS forbids '0' sized records.

> +     }
> +
> +     // We need one extra for ctx->rx_aad_ciphertext
> +     nsg++;
> +
> +     if (nsg > ARRAY_SIZE(sgin_arr))
>               sgin = kmalloc_array(nsg, sizeof(*sgin), sk->sk_allocation);

Add check for kmalloc_array returnining NULL.

> +
> +     if (!sgout)
>               sgout = sgin;
> -     }
> 
>       sg_init_table(sgin, nsg);
>       sg_set_buf(&sgin[0], ctx->rx_aad_ciphertext, TLS_AAD_SPACE_SIZE);
> --
> 2.17.1

Reply via email to