On Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT) > David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700 > > > > > Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any > > > differently than out-of-tree other code. > > > > I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to > > requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable. > > Don't you think? > > > Netdump doesn't even exist in the current Fedora source rpm. > I think Dave dropped it.
Indeed. Practically no-one cared about it, so it bit-rotted really fast after we shipped RHEL4. That, along with the focus shifting to making kdump work seemed to kill it off over the last 12 months. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html