On 09/27/2018 06:02 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:

> I am not suggesting to commit this. This is just a hack for debugging.
> It in fact lead to some warnings, but still allowed me to reproduce
> the bug reliably.
> 

Had you got more meaningful stack traces ?

(Showing which context was actually doing the dst_release())

>>> +                               dst_destroy_rcu(&dst->rcu_head);
>>> +                       }
>>> +               }
>>>         }
>>>  }

Thanks.

Reply via email to