On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:55:52AM -0700, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 9:18 AM Dave Jones <da...@codemonkey.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > Callers of bond_for_each_slave_rcu are expected to hold the rcu lock,
> > otherwise a trace like below is shown
>
> So why not take rcu read lock in netpoll_send_skb_on_dev() where
> RCU is also assumed?
that does seem to solve the backtrace spew I saw too, so if that's
preferable I can respin the patch.
> As I said, I can't explain why you didn't trigger the RCU warning in
> netpoll_send_skb_on_dev()...
netpoll_send_skb_on_dev takes the rcu lock itself.
Dave
