On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 11:38:38AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Wednesday 25 October 2006 02:37, John W. Linville wrote: > > Michael, > > > > It looks like you have a patch that I don't have, one that moves the > > netif_tx_disable and spin_lock_irqsave outside of the "if (badness > > > BADNESS_LIMIT)" conditional. > > > > Could you pass that one along as well, or correct this patch to match > > what is in Linus' tree? > > Well, I'm not sure who moved the tx_disable outside of the > conditional. It is not needed. We only need to disable TX on > the slowpath (the first branch of the if condition). It does not > hurt to disable it always, though. > But I will send a new patch against wireless-2.6, which only disables > TX for the slowpath and fakes a TX there. > > But for Greg, the original patch is ok. > How was the stable mailing list again? [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to bounce.
As per the MAINTAINERS file, it is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please send this there, it will not get lost that way. thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
