On 08.11.2018 23:33, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 11/8/18 1:55 PM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Flag PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT is used only here for this small check. I think
>> using interrupts isn't possible if a driver defines neither
>> config_intr nor ack_interrupts callback. So we can replace checking
>> flag PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT with checking for these callbacks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 5 +++--
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> index d165a2c82..33e51b955 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
>> @@ -2104,8 +2104,9 @@ static int phy_probe(struct device *dev)
>>      /* Disable the interrupt if the PHY doesn't support it
>>       * but the interrupt is still a valid one
>>       */
>> -    if (!(phydrv->flags & PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT) &&
>> -        phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev))
>> +     if (!phydrv->config_intr &&
>> +         !phydrv->ack_interrupt &&
>> +         phy_interrupt_is_valid(phydev))
>>              phydev->irq = PHY_POLL;
> 
> I would introduce an inline helper function which checks for
> drv->config_intr and config_ack_interrupt, that way if we ever have to
> introduce an additional function in the future, we just update the
> helper to check for that.
> 
> Other than that, LGTM
> 
OK, will add a helper and remove PHY_HAS_INTERRUPT from all drivers.

Reply via email to