W dniu 10.11.2018 o 22:01, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
On Sat, 10 Nov 2018 21:02:10 +0100
Paweł Staszewski <pstaszew...@itcare.pl> wrote:

W dniu 10.11.2018 o 20:34, Jesper Dangaard Brouer pisze:
I want you to experiment with:

   ethtool --set-priv-flags DEVICE rx_striding_rq off
just checked that previously connectx4 was have thos disabled:
   ethtool --show-priv-flags enp175s0f0

Private flags for enp175s0f0:
rx_cqe_moder       : on
tx_cqe_moder       : off
rx_cqe_compress    : off
rx_striding_rq     : off
rx_no_csum_complete: off

The CX4 hardware does not have this feature (p.s. the CX4-Lx does).

So now we are on connectx5 and we have enabled - for sure connectx5
changed cpu load - where i have now max 50/60% cpu where with connectx4
there was sometimes near 100% with same configuration.
I (strongly) believe the CPU load was related to the page-alloactor
lock congestion, that Aaron fixed.

Yes i think both - most problems with cpu was due to page-allocator problems. But also after change connctx4 to connectx5 there is cpu load difference - about 10% in total - but yes most of this like 40% is cause of Aaron patch :) - rly good job :)


Now im messing with ring configuration for connectx5 nics.
And after reading that paper:
https://netdevconf.org/2.1/slides/apr6/network-performance/ 04-amir-RX_and_TX_bulking_v2.pdf

changed from RX:8192 / TX: 4096 to RX:8192 / TX: 256

after this i gain about 5Gbit/s RX and TX traffic and less cpu load....
before change there was 59/59 Gbit/s

After change there is 64/64 Gbit/s

 bwm-ng v0.6.1 (probing every 1.000s), press 'h' for help
  input: /proc/net/dev type: rate
  |         iface                   Rx Tx                Total
==============================================================================
         enp175s0:          44.45 Gb/s           19.69 Gb/s           64.14 Gb/s          enp216s0:          19.69 Gb/s           44.49 Gb/s           64.19 Gb/s
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            total:          64.14 Gb/s           64.18 Gb/s 128.33 Gb/s











Reply via email to