On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 08:52:23PM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > I actually wanted to follow up with a v2 when > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/16/243 reaches bpf-next (I got an ack > already).
it will go via perf tree, so not related. > Alternatively, I can follow up with another patch on top of that to fix > libbfd feature detection (it's semi broken on ubuntu/fedora now). I think you'd need to wait until all trees merge. pls don't top post. > On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 8:47 PM Alexei Starovoitov < > alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:44 PM Stanislav Fomichev <s...@google.com> wrote: > > > > > > Make it possible to build bpftool without libbfd. libbfd and libopcodes > > are > > > typically provided in dev/dbg packages (binutils-dev in debian) which we > > > usually don't have installed on the fleet machines and we'd like a way > > to have > > > bpftool version that works without installing any additional packages. > > > This excludes support for disassembling jit-ted code and prints an error > > if > > > the user tries to use these features. > > > > > > Tested by: > > > cat > FEATURES_DUMP.bpftool <<EOF > > > feature-libbfd=0 > > > feature-disassembler-four-args=1 > > > feature-reallocarray=0 > > > feature-libelf=1 > > > feature-libelf-mmap=1 > > > feature-bpf=1 > > > EOF > > > FEATURES_DUMP=$PWD/FEATURES_DUMP.bpftool make > > > ldd bpftool | grep libbfd > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <s...@google.com> > > > > applied, thanks > >
