On 11/28/18 5:22 PM, Peter Oskolkov wrote:
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index bd0df75dc7b6..17f3c37218e5 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -4793,6 +4793,60 @@ static int bpf_push_seg6_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, 
> u32 type, void *hdr, u32 len
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_BPF */
>  
> +static int bpf_push_ip_encap(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr, u32 len)
> +{
> +     struct dst_entry *dst;
> +     struct rtable *rt;
> +     struct iphdr *iph;
> +     struct net *net;
> +     int err;
> +
> +     if (skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP))
> +             return -EINVAL;  /* ETH_P_IPV6 not yet supported */
> +
> +     iph = (struct iphdr *)hdr;
> +
> +     if (unlikely(len < sizeof(struct iphdr) || len > 
> LWTUNNEL_MAX_ENCAP_HSIZE))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +     if (unlikely(iph->version != 4 || iph->ihl * 4 > len))
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
> +     if (skb->sk)
> +             net = sock_net(skb->sk);
> +     else {
> +             net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev);
> +     }
> +     rt = ip_route_output(net, iph->daddr, 0, 0, 0);

That is a very limited use case. e.g., oif = 0 means you are not
considering any kind of policy routing (e.g., VRF).

Reply via email to