On 12/01/2018 12:33 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:02:00AM -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> >> Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2018 11:34:55 +0100 >> >>> Yeah fully agree. Thinking diff below should address it, do you >>> have a chance to give this a spin for sparc / 32 bit to check if >>> test_verifier still explodes? >> >> Great, let me play with this. >> >> I did something simpler yesterday, just changing the data pointers to >> "u64" and that made at least one test pass that didn't before :-) >> >> I'll get back to you with results. > > Did you have a chance to test it ?
David got back to me and mentioned it worked fine on sparc. > I'd like to add a tested-by before I apply Daniel's patch > which looks good to me. btw. Yeah, wanted to cook an official patch today, let me do that now.