On 03/12/2018 15:00, René van Dorst wrote:
Quoting Bjørn Mork <bj...@mork.no>:
Greg Ungerer <g...@kernel.org> writes:

The following change helped alot, but I still get some problems under
sustained load and some types of port setups. Still trying to figure
out what exactly is going on.

--- a/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
+++ b/linux/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c
@@ -1750,8 +1750,8 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_handle_irq_rx(int irq, void *_eth)
       if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&eth->rx_napi))) {
                __napi_schedule(&eth->rx_napi);
-               mtk_rx_irq_disable(eth, MTK_RX_DONE_INT);
        }
+       mtk_rx_irq_disable(eth, MTK_RX_DONE_INT);
       return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
@@ -1762,11 +1762,53 @@ static irqreturn_t mtk_handle_irq_tx(int irq, void *_eth)
       if (likely(napi_schedule_prep(&eth->tx_napi))) {
                __napi_schedule(&eth->tx_napi);
-               mtk_tx_irq_disable(eth, MTK_TX_DONE_INT);
        }
+       mtk_tx_irq_disable(eth, MTK_TX_DONE_INT);
       return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }

Yes, sorry I didn't point to that as well.  Just to be clear:  I have no
clue how this thing is actually wired up, or if you could use three
interrupts on the MT7621 too. I just messed with it until I got
something to work, based on Renés original idea and code.

My idea is a just a copy of mtk_handle_irq_{rx,tx} see [1]
You probably want to look at the staging driver or Ubiquity source with a 3.10.x kernel [2] or padavan with 3.4.x kernel [3].
AFAIK mt7621 only has 1 IRQ for ethernet part.

correct there is only 1 single IRQ on mt7621

    John




Greats,

René

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c#n1739 [2] https://www.ubnt.com/download/edgemax/edgerouter-x-sfp/default/edgerouter-er-xer-x-sfpep-r6-firmware-v1107 [3] https://bitbucket.org/padavan/rt-n56u/src/e6f45337528f668651e251057a1a0fec735f6df1/trunk/linux-3.4.x/drivers/net/raeth/raether.c?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#raether.c-658


Reply via email to