On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 13:19:20 -0800
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 15:26 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On my box with Debian testing, I see a new problem with
> > suspend/resume of wired network device.
> > Using stock Debian kernel 4.18.0-2-amd64
> > 
> > After suspend/resume cycle, IP address is lost.
> > 
> > Device Info:
> > $ /sbin/ethtool -i enp12s0
> > driver: igb
> > version: 5.4.0-k
> > firmware-version:  0. 6-1
> > expansion-rom-version: 
> > bus-info: 0000:0c:00.0
> > supports-statistics: yes
> > supports-test: yes
> > supports-eeprom-access: yes
> > supports-register-dump: yes
> > supports-priv-flags: yes
> > 
> > 
> > $ lspci -v -s 0000:0c:00.0
> > 0c:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation I211 Gigabit Network
> > Connection (rev 03)
> >     Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd I211 Gigabit Network
> > Connection
> >     Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17, NUMA node 0
> >     Memory at dfb00000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=128K]
> >     I/O ports at c000 [size=32]
> >     Memory at dfb20000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> >     Capabilities: <access denied>
> >     Kernel driver in use: igb
> >     Kernel modules: igb
> > 
> > State before suspend:
> > $ ip addr show dev enp12s0
> > 4: enp12s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
> > UP group default qlen 1000
> >     link/ether 1c:1b:0d:0a:4b:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> >     inet 192.168.1.18/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global enp12s0
> >        valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> > 
> > State after resume:
> > 
> > $ ip addr show dev enp12s0
> > 4: enp12s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state
> > UP group default qlen 1000
> >     link/ether 1c:1b:0d:0a:4b:0e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:f
> > 
> > Doing ifdown/ifup which restarts the DHCP client does restore the
> > address.
> > 
> > Not sure if this is a kernel issue with carrier handling, Intel
> > driver issue, or DHCP client issue.  
> 
> We have not been able to reproduce this using Fedora and 4.18 kernel. 
> This looks to be a Debian/DHCP client specific issue, we are continuing
> our reproduction efforts but with Debian to see if we can determine a
> root cause.

Great, thanks. I will reproduce with latest update, and file Debian bug.

Reply via email to