From: Mathias Krause <[email protected]>

Commit 565f0fa902b6 ("xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct
xfrm_state") moved xfrm state objects to use their own slab cache.
However, it missed to adapt xfrm_user to use this new cache when
freeing xfrm states.

Fix this by introducing and make use of a new helper for freeing
xfrm_state objects.

Fixes: 565f0fa902b6 ("xfrm: use a dedicated slab cache for struct xfrm_state")
Reported-by: Pan Bian <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v4.18+
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <[email protected]>
---
 include/net/xfrm.h    | 1 +
 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 8 +++++++-
 net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c  | 4 ++--
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
index 0eb390c205af..da588def3c61 100644
--- a/include/net/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
@@ -1552,6 +1552,7 @@ int xfrm_state_walk(struct net *net, struct 
xfrm_state_walk *walk,
                    int (*func)(struct xfrm_state *, int, void*), void *);
 void xfrm_state_walk_done(struct xfrm_state_walk *walk, struct net *net);
 struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_alloc(struct net *net);
+void xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x);
 struct xfrm_state *xfrm_state_find(const xfrm_address_t *daddr,
                                   const xfrm_address_t *saddr,
                                   const struct flowi *fl,
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
index 12cdb350c456..cc0203efb584 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
@@ -426,6 +426,12 @@ static void xfrm_put_mode(struct xfrm_mode *mode)
        module_put(mode->owner);
 }
 
+void xfrm_state_free(struct xfrm_state *x)
+{
+       kmem_cache_free(xfrm_state_cache, x);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xfrm_state_free);
+
 static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
 {
        tasklet_hrtimer_cancel(&x->mtimer);
@@ -452,7 +458,7 @@ static void xfrm_state_gc_destroy(struct xfrm_state *x)
        }
        xfrm_dev_state_free(x);
        security_xfrm_state_free(x);
-       kmem_cache_free(xfrm_state_cache, x);
+       xfrm_state_free(x);
 }
 
 static void xfrm_state_gc_task(struct work_struct *work)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
index ca7a207b81a9..683080172655 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
@@ -2288,13 +2288,13 @@ static int xfrm_add_acquire(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
nlmsghdr *nlh,
 
        }
 
-       kfree(x);
+       xfrm_state_free(x);
        kfree(xp);
 
        return 0;
 
 free_state:
-       kfree(x);
+       xfrm_state_free(x);
 nomem:
        return err;
 }
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to