jamal wrote: > Ok, both looked good except for the test of a single entry. > This was because you would break out of the loop with count of 0. > The patch against yours would look like something attached for the state > case. Dont forget there are two spots on the policy side of things;->
You're right, that case was also broken. With your patch on top it looks all right. > You can either submit both patches or i could later today. If you do, > please look at some of the comments i made in the first patch and > include them. I'd prefer if you did it since you're already testing the thing :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
