[PATCH bpf-next v5 08/12] nfp: bpf: don't use instruction number for jump target

[Jakub Kicinski]

Instruction number is meaningless at code gen phase.  The target
of the instruction is overwritten by nfp_fixup_branches().  The
convention is to put the raw offset in target address as a place
holder.  See cmp_* functions.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicin...@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.mon...@netronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
index e23ca90289f7..323587dee498 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/bpf/jit.c
@@ -3182,7 +3182,7 @@ bpf_to_bpf_call(struct nfp_prog *nfp_prog, struct 
nfp_insn_meta *meta)
                wrp_immed_relo(nfp_prog, imm_b(nfp_prog), 0, RELO_IMMED_REL);
        } else {
                ret_tgt = nfp_prog_current_offset(nfp_prog) + 2;
-               emit_br(nfp_prog, BR_UNC, meta->n + 1 + meta->insn.imm, 1);
+               emit_br(nfp_prog, BR_UNC, meta->insn.imm, 1);
                offset_br = nfp_prog_current_offset(nfp_prog);
        }
        wrp_immed_relo(nfp_prog, ret_reg(nfp_prog), ret_tgt, RELO_IMMED_REL);
-- 
2.19.2