Eric, Are you going to propose the change then?
I'm happy to test it out. On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:00 PM Michal Kubecek <mkube...@suse.cz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 02:26:32PM -0800, Ivan Babrou wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Continuing from this thread earlier today: > > > > * https://marc.info/?t=154886729100001&r=1&w=2 > > > > We fired up KASAN enabled kernel one one of those machine and this is > > what we saw: > ... > > This commit from 4.19.14 seems relevant: > > > > * > > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d5f9565c8d5ad3cf94982223cfcef1169b0bb60f > > > > As a reminder, we upgraded from 4.19.13 and started seeing crashes. > > Unfortunately I'm on vacation this week so that my capability to look > deeper into this is limited but there seems to be one obvious problem > with the 4.19.y backport: in mainline, there is > > err = -EINVAL; > > right on top of the "Find out where to put this fragment." comment which > had been added by commit 0ff89efb5246 ("ip: fail fast on IP defrag > errors"). In 4.19.y backport of the commit, this assignment is missing > so that the value of err at this point comes from earlier > pskb_trim_rcsum() call so that it must be zero and if we take any of the > "goto err" added by commit d5f9565c8d5a, we drop the packet by calling > kfree_skb() but return zero so that caller doesn't know about it. > > Michal Kubecek >