On Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:02:27 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote: > I don't see any reason why packets with DSCP=0x40 should have lower IEEE > 802.1D priority than packets with DSCP=0x20. Spare > Background. No?
Hm, seems so. Jouni, is there any reason for this? > > Signed-off-by: Zhu Yi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > > net/d80211/wme.c | 4 ++-- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > e1765ea0d80ad86619300d3253e801883fd745a5 > diff --git a/net/d80211/wme.c b/net/d80211/wme.c > index b9505dc..f26fe6c 100644 > --- a/net/d80211/wme.c > +++ b/net/d80211/wme.c > @@ -131,9 +131,9 @@ static inline unsigned classify_1d(struc > dscp = ip->tos & 0xfc; > switch (dscp) { > case 0x20: > - return 2; > - case 0x40: > return 1; > + case 0x40: > + return 2; > case 0x60: > return 3; > case 0x80: Thanks, Jiri -- Jiri Benc SUSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html