Sat, Feb 09, 2019 at 04:16:10AM CET, [email protected] wrote:
>Vendor may sound ambiguous, let's rename the fab string to
>"board.manufacture".
>
>Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
>Reviewed-by: Dirk van der Merwe <[email protected]>
>---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>index dddbb0575be9..6e15e216732a 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_devlink.c
>@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static const struct nfp_devlink_versions_simple {
> } nfp_devlink_versions_hwinfo[] = {
> { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_ID, "assembly.partno", },
> { DEVLINK_INFO_VERSION_GENERIC_BOARD_REV, "assembly.revision", },
>- { "board.vendor", /* fab */ "assembly.vendor", },
>+ { "board.manufacture", "assembly.vendor", },
I wonder, why this is not among generic?
> { "board.model", /* code name */ "assembly.model", },
> };
>
>--
>2.19.2
>