On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 12:50:31AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> From what I can see, the port_vlan_add()/port_vlan_del() implementation
> is far from ideal, just like "always enabling flooding for CPU/DSA
> ports" is not ideal.
There also seems to be a discrepency between what net/dsa wants to do
and some of the implementations in drivers/net/dsa:
dsa_switch_vlan_add() does this:
bitmap_zero(ds->bitmap, ds->num_ports);
if (ds->index == info->sw_index)
set_bit(info->port, ds->bitmap);
for (port = 0; port < ds->num_ports; port++)
if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port))
set_bit(port, ds->bitmap);
We then call ds->ops->port_vlan_add() for each port in ds->bitmap,
which will include DSA and CPU ports on every switch in the tree.
For rtl8366, this calls into rtl8366_vlan_add(), which does:
if (dsa_is_dsa_port(ds, port) || dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
dev_err(smi->dev, "port is DSA or CPU port\n");
which is surely a guaranteed error message if we have any CPU or DSA
ports specified on a rtl8366. The example in the DT documentation
for this driver does suggest that it is capable of having CPU ports.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
