On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > It is hard to say what kind of bug to expect > because at the same time other net_rx_action > with the same vlan dev could take place on > other processor and this inetdev_init could > do more.
Sorry! inetdev_init couldn't do more because of rtnl lock but anyway the rest should be valid: > The main thing is the possibility of processing > skb with not entirely open source dev which isn't > expected (and checked) by receive functions. > I think the easiest way to convince yourself is > to add temporarily IFF_UP flag checking with > dropping at the beginning of netif_receive_skb and > __vlan_hwaccel_rx. Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
