Hi, On Wednesday 10 January 2007 13:32, Patrick McHardy wrote: > How exactly are dynamic ports handled? Do you just add a catch-all rule > that filters based on socket lookups? > > In that case you could do something like this: > > ip route add local default dev lo scope host table 1 > ip rule add fwmark 0x1 lookup 1 > > and still use the socket lookups for marking, which would (without the > socket caching) remove the need for this patch entirely.
Ok, I'll try to address all the concerns raised on the list. Thanks a lot for the review and comments. -- Regards, Krisztian Kovacs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
