We get this regression when using RTL8366RB as part of a bridge
with OpenWrt:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1347 at net/switchdev/switchdev.c:291
         switchdev_port_attr_set_now+0x80/0xa4
lan0: Commit of attribute (id=7) failed.
(...)
realtek-smi switch lan0: failed to initialize vlan filtering on this port

This is because it is trying to disable VLAN filtering
on VLAN0, as we have forgot to add 1 to the port number
to get the right VLAN in rtl8366_vlan_filtering(): when
we initialize the VLAN we associate VLAN1 with port 0,
VLAN2 with port 1 etc, so we need to add 1 to the port
offset.

Fixes: d8652956cf37 ("net: dsa: realtek-smi: Add Realtek SMI driver")
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
index 6dedd43442cc..35b767baf21f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/rtl8366.c
@@ -307,7 +307,8 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, 
bool vlan_filtering)
        struct rtl8366_vlan_4k vlan4k;
        int ret;
 
-       if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port))
+       /* Use VLAN nr port + 1 since VLAN0 is not valid */
+       if (!smi->ops->is_vlan_valid(smi, port + 1))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        dev_info(smi->dev, "%s filtering on port %d\n",
@@ -318,12 +319,12 @@ int rtl8366_vlan_filtering(struct dsa_switch *ds, int 
port, bool vlan_filtering)
         * The hardware support filter ID (FID) 0..7, I have no clue how to
         * support this in the driver when the callback only says on/off.
         */
-       ret = smi->ops->get_vlan_4k(smi, port, &vlan4k);
+       ret = smi->ops->get_vlan_4k(smi, port + 1, &vlan4k);
        if (ret)
                return ret;
 
        /* Just set the filter to FID 1 for now then */
-       ret = rtl8366_set_vlan(smi, port,
+       ret = rtl8366_set_vlan(smi, port + 1,
                               vlan4k.member,
                               vlan4k.untag,
                               1);
-- 
2.21.0

Reply via email to