On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 09:45:18PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 11:18:38AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > > > I don't mean it's necessary. I mean now skb is freed > > unconditionally and after this patch, if there is some > > error in counting, skb will stay. I thought Masayuki > > wrote about such possibility, but if I missed his > > point, then the rest is really O.K. > > OK, I see what you mean. > > I'm not aware of anybody who has coded in this way. Alexey & Dave, > do you know of any place where __kfree_skb is used to free an skb > whose ref count is greater than 1?
I'm sure it wasn't done on purpose! But it could hide some errors anyway. Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
