On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 18:04:53 +0000, Takshak Chahande wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> wrote on Mon [2019-Jul-29
> 14:35:38 -0700]:
> > @@ -158,20 +161,30 @@ static int show_attached_bpf_progs(int cgroup_fd,
> > enum bpf_attach_type type,
> > static int do_show(int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> > enum bpf_attach_type type;
> > + const char *path;
> > int cgroup_fd;
> > int ret = -1;
> >
> > - if (argc < 1) {
> > - p_err("too few parameters for cgroup show");
> > - goto exit;
> > - } else if (argc > 1) {
> > - p_err("too many parameters for cgroup show");
> > - goto exit;
> > + query_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!REQ_ARGS(1))
> > + return -1;
> > + path = GET_ARG();
> > +
> > + while (argc) {
> > + if (is_prefix(*argv, "effective")) {
> > + query_flags |= BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE;
> > + NEXT_ARG();
> > + } else {
> > + p_err("expected no more arguments, 'effective', got:
> > '%s'?",
> > + *argv);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > }
> This while loop will allow multiple 'effective' keywords in the argument
> unnecessarily. IMO, we should strictly restrict only for single
> occurance of 'effective' word.
It's kind of the way all bpftool works to date :(
But perhaps not checking is worse than inconsistency? Okay, let's fix
this up.
> > - cgroup_fd = open(argv[0], O_RDONLY);
> > + cgroup_fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
> > if (cgroup_fd < 0) {
> > - p_err("can't open cgroup %s", argv[0]);
> > + p_err("can't open cgroup %s", path);
> > goto exit;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -297,23 +310,29 @@ static int do_show_tree(int argc, char **argv)
> > char *cgroup_root;
> > int ret;
> >
> > - switch (argc) {
> > - case 0:
> > + query_flags = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!argc) {
> > cgroup_root = find_cgroup_root();
> > if (!cgroup_root) {
> > p_err("cgroup v2 isn't mounted");
> > return -1;
> > }
> > - break;
> > - case 1:
> > - cgroup_root = argv[0];
> > - break;
> > - default:
> > - p_err("too many parameters for cgroup tree");
> > - return -1;
> > + } else {
> > + cgroup_root = GET_ARG();
> > +
> > + while (argc) {
> > + if (is_prefix(*argv, "effective")) {
> > + query_flags |= BPF_F_QUERY_EFFECTIVE;
> > + NEXT_ARG();
>
> NEXT_ARG() does update argc value; that means after this outer if/else we
> need
> to know how argc has become 0 (through which path) before freeing up
> `cgroup_root` allocated
> memory later at the end of this function.
Good catch!
> > + } else {
> > + p_err("expected no more arguments, 'effective',
> > got: '%s'?",
> > + *argv);
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > + }
> > }
> Thanks for the patch. Apart from above two issues, patch looks good.
Thanks for the review.
