On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 9:41 AM Quentin Monnet
<quentin.mon...@netronome.com> wrote:
>
> 2019-08-15 22:08 UTC-0700 ~ Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoi...@gmail.com>
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 7:32 AM Quentin Monnet
> > <quentin.mon...@netronome.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >> Because the "__printf()" attributes were used only where the functions are
> >> implemented, and not in header files, the checks have not been enforced on
> >> all the calls to printf()-like functions, and a number of errors slipped in
> >> bpftool over time.
> >>
> >> This set cleans up such errors, and then moves the "__printf()" attributes
> >> to header files, so that the checks are performed at all locations.
> >
> > Applied. Thanks
> >
>
> Thanks Alexei!
>
> I noticed the set was applied to the bpf-next tree, and not bpf. Just
> checking if this is intentional?
Yes. I don't see the _fix_ part in there.
Looks like cleanup to me.
I've also considered to push
commit d34b044038bf ("tools: bpftool: close prog FD before exit on
showing a single program")
to bpf-next as well.
That fd leak didn't feel that necessary to push to bpf tree
and risk merge conflicts... but I pushed it to bpf at the end.
