On 8/20/19 1:47 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
This adds a configure check for libbpf and renames functions to allow lib/bpf.c to be compiled with it present. This makes it possible to port functionality piecemeal to use libbpf.Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@redhat.com> --- configure | 16 ++++++++++++++++ include/bpf_util.h | 6 +++--- ip/ipvrf.c | 4 ++-- lib/bpf.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/configure b/configure index 45fcffb6..5a89ee9f 100755 --- a/configure +++ b/configure @@ -238,6 +238,19 @@ check_elf() fi }+check_libbpf()+{ + if ${PKG_CONFIG} libbpf --exists; then + echo "HAVE_LIBBPF:=y" >>$CONFIG + echo "yes" + + echo 'CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBPF' `${PKG_CONFIG} libbpf --cflags` >> $CONFIG + echo 'LDLIBS += ' `${PKG_CONFIG} libbpf --libs` >>$CONFIG + else + echo "no" + fi +} + check_selinux()
More of an implementation detail at this point in time, but want to make sure this doesn't get missed along the way: as discussed at bpfconf [0] best for iproute2 to handle libbpf support would be the same way of integration as pahole does, that is, to integrate it via submodule [1] to allow kernel and libbpf features to be in sync with iproute2 releases and therefore easily consume extensions we're adding to libbpf to aide iproute2 integration. Thanks, Daniel [0] http://vger.kernel.org/bpfconf2019.html#session-4 [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/commit/?id=21507cd3e97bc5692d97201ee68df044c6767e9a
