[PATCH net-next 09/14] net/smc: move the TEST_LINK response processing into event handler

[Karsten Graul]

Get rid of the extra function and move the two-liner for the TEST_LINK
response processing into the event handler function.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgr...@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ursula Braun <ubr...@linux.ibm.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_llc.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_llc.c b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
index f9ec270818fa..4945abbad111 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_llc.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_llc.c
@@ -563,13 +563,6 @@ static void smc_llc_rx_delete_link(struct smc_link *link,
        smc_lgr_terminate_sched(lgr);
 }
 
-static void smc_llc_rx_test_link(struct smc_link *link,
-                                struct smc_llc_msg_test_link *llc)
-{
-       llc->hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
-       smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
-}
-
 static void smc_llc_rx_confirm_rkey(struct smc_link *link,
                                    struct smc_llc_msg_confirm_rkey *llc)
 {
@@ -640,7 +633,8 @@ static void smc_llc_event_handler(struct smc_llc_qentry 
*qentry)
 
        switch (llc->raw.hdr.common.type) {
        case SMC_LLC_TEST_LINK:
-               smc_llc_rx_test_link(link, &llc->test_link);
+               llc->test_link.hd.flags |= SMC_LLC_FLAG_RESP;
+               smc_llc_send_message(link, llc);
                break;
        case SMC_LLC_ADD_LINK:
                if (list_empty(&lgr->list))
-- 
2.17.1