> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org <netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org> On
> Behalf Of Punit Agrawal
> Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2020 9:31 PM
> To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
> Cc: daniel.sangor...@toshiba.co.jp; Punit Agrawal
> <punit1.agra...@toshiba.co.jp>; Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.h.du...@linux.intel.com>; David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>;
> intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> ker...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] e1000e: Relax condition to trigger reset for ME workaround
>
> It's an error if the value of the RX/TX tail descriptor does not match
> what was written. The error condition is true regardless the duration
> of the interference from ME. But the driver only performs the reset if
> E1000_ICH_FWSM_PCIM2PCI_COUNT (2000) iterations of 50us delay have
> transpired. The extra condition can lead to inconsistency between the
> state of hardware as expected by the driver.
>
> Fix this by dropping the check for number of delay iterations.
>
> While at it, also make __ew32_prepare() static as it's not used
> anywhere else.
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agra...@toshiba.co.jp>
> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.du...@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirs...@intel.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <da...@davemloft.net>
> Cc: intel-wired-...@lists.osuosl.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> Hi Jeff,
>
> If there are no further comments please consider merging the patch.
>
> Also, should it be marked for backport to stable?
>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> RFC[0] -> v1:
> * Dropped return value for __ew32_prepare() as it's not used
> * Made __ew32_prepare() static
> * Added tags
>
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/5/12/20
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/e1000.h | 1 -
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 12 +++++-------
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.br...@intel.com>
