On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 07:37:49PM +0000, David Laight wrote: > I'm going to post a V3 of my big patch - I spotted an error. > I'll include a different (smaller) patch in 0/1 that generates > exactly the same object code but is easier to review.
Please make sure to split at least setsockopt and getsockopt changes into different patches. That will help quite a lot already. And to adopt the memset at the end of sctp_setsockopt_auth_key(), to avoid special handling later on. Thanks, Marcelo
