On Fri, 2020-05-29 at 12:12 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2020 23:56:42 -0700 Saeed Mahameed wrote:
> > From: Maor Dickman <ma...@mellanox.com>
> >
> > On tunnel decap rule insertion, the indirect mechanism will attempt
> > to
> > offload the rule on all uplink representors which will trigger the
> > "devices are not on same switch HW, can't offload forwarding"
> > message
> > for the uplink which isn't on the same switch HW as the VF
> > representor.
> >
> > The above flow is valid and shouldn't cause warning message,
> > fix by removing the warning and only report this flow using extack.
> >
> > Fixes: f3953003a66f ("net/mlx5e: Fix allowed tc redirect merged
> > eswitch offload cases")
> > Signed-off-by: Maor Dickman <ma...@mellanox.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <r...@mellanox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
>
> Fixes tag: Fixes: f3953003a66f ("net/mlx5e: Fix allowed tc redirect
> merged eswitch offload cases")
> Has these problem(s):
> - Target SHA1 does not exist
Fixing, thanks !
