On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here. > > > We should break the dependency like this. > > > > > > Could someone who uses proxy ARP test this? > > > > Sorry Stephen, this isn't necessary. The lockdep thing is > > simply confused here. It's treating tbl->proxy_queue as the > > same thing as neigh->arp_queue when they're clearly different. > > > > I'm disappointed that after all this time lockdep is still > > producing bogus reports like this. I'm sure we've been > > through this particular issue many times already. > > > what's the exact lockdep output here?
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg35266.html Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
