On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:03:45PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > bpf_map__set_pin_path()
> > bpf_create_map_in_map() <- create inner or outer map
> > bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, inner/outer_fd)
> > bpf_object__load(obj)
> > - bpf_object__load_xattr()
> > - bpf_object__create_maps()
> > - if (map->fd >= 0)
> > continue <- this will skip pinning map
>
> so maybe that's the part that needs to be fixed?..
Hmm...maybe, let me see
>
> I'm still not sure. And to be honest your examples are still a bit too
> succinct for me to follow where the problem is exactly. Can you please
> elaborate a bit more?
Let's take iproute2 legacy map for example, if it's a map-in-map type with
pin path defined. In user space we could do like:
if (bpf_obj_get(pathname) < 0) {
bpf_create_map_in_map();
bpf_map__reuse_fd(map, map_fd);
}
bpf_map__set_pin_path(map, pathname);
bpf_object__load(obj)
So in libbpf we need
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 32dc444224d8..5412aa7169db 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -4215,7 +4215,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
if (map->fd >= 0) {
pr_debug("map '%s': skipping creation (preset fd=%d)\n",
map->name, map->fd);
- continue;
+ goto check_pin_path;
}
err = bpf_object__create_map(obj, map);
@@ -4258,6 +4258,7 @@ bpf_object__create_maps(struct bpf_object *obj)
map->init_slots_sz = 0;
}
+check_pin_path:
if (map->pin_path && !map->pinned) {
err = bpf_map__pin(map, NULL);
if (err) {
Do you think if this change be better?
Thanks
Hangbin