On 10/9/20 9:38 AM, Vlad Buslov wrote: > > On Fri 09 Oct 2020 at 15:45, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote: >> On 2020-10-09 8:15 a.m., Vlad Buslov wrote: >>> >>> On Fri 09 Oct 2020 at 15:03, Jamal Hadi Salim <j...@mojatatu.com> wrote: >> >>>> Which test(s)? >>>> I see for example d45e mentioning terse but i dont see corresponding >>>> code in the iproute2 tree i just pulled. >>> >>> Yes. The tests d45e and 7c65 were added as a part of kernel series, but >>> corresponding iproute2 patches were never merged. Tests expect original >>> "terse flag" syntax of V1 iproute2 series and will have to be changed to >>> use -brief option instead. >> >> Then i dont see a problem in changing the tests. >> If you are going to send a v3 please include my acked-by. >> Would have been nice to see what terse output would have looked like. >> >> cheers, >> jamal > > Sure. Just waiting for everyone to voice their opinion regarding the > output format before proceeding with any changes. >
go ahead and send a v3 with example output. cc Jamal and Cong
