Oh well, one thing at a time.  The good news is that I can reproduce the
problem with netperf.

kpm:/usr/src/netperf-2.4.3> netperf -H akpm2 -t UDP_RR
UDP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to akpm2 
(172.18.116.155) port 0 AF_INET
netperf: receive_response: no response received. errno 0 counter 0

That's running netserver on the test machine.

The machine running netperf is 172.18.116.160 and the test machine running
netserver is 172.18.116.155

tcpdump from the test machine:

15:24:37.924210 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:38.859309 IP 172.18.119.252.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: state=standby group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:39.078273 IP 172.18.119.253.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=active group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:39.924074 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:40.017081 IP 172.24.0.7.domain > 172.18.116.57.37456: 59635 4/7/6 CNAME[|domain]
15:24:41.383433 IP 172.18.116.160.33137 > 172.18.116.155.12865: S 
2760291763:2760291763(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 1967355840 0,nop,wscale 
8>
15:24:41.383479 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: S 
1640262480:1640262480(0) ack 2760291764 win 5792 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 7714 
1967355840,nop,wscale 7>
15:24:41.383683 IP 172.18.116.160.33137 > 172.18.116.155.12865: . ack 1 win 23 
<nop,nop,timestamp 1967355840 7714>
15:24:41.383883 IP 172.18.116.160.33137 > 172.18.116.155.12865: P 1:257(256) ack 1 
win 23 <nop,nop,timestamp 1967355840 7714>
15:24:41.383902 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: . ack 257 win 54 
<nop,nop,timestamp 7714 1967355840>
15:24:41.384065 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 
win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 7714 1967355840>
15:24:41.587266 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 
win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 7765 1967355840>
15:24:41.839234 IP 172.18.119.252.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=standby group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:41.924303 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:41.995285 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 7867 1967355840>
15:24:42.030341 IP 172.18.119.253.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=active group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:42.811330 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 
win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 8071 1967355840>
15:24:43.924183 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:44.121880 IP 172.24.0.7.domain > 172.18.116.22.46700: 52073* 1/4/4 A[|domain]
15:24:44.443419 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 
win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 8479 1967355840>
15:24:44.723257 IP 172.18.119.252.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=standby group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:44.886356 IP 172.18.119.253.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=active group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:45.924263 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:47.659300 IP 172.18.119.252.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: state=standby group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:47.707599 IP 172.18.116.155.12865 > 172.18.116.160.33137: P 1:257(256) ack 257 
win 54 <nop,nop,timestamp 9295 1967355840>
15:24:47.874419 IP 172.18.119.253.hsrp > 224.0.0.2.hsrp: HSRPv0-hello 20: 
state=active group=1 addr=172.18.119.254
15:24:47.952350 802.1d config 8000.00:18:74:5d:04:66.80ae root 0066.00:15:c7:20:57:c0 pathcost 4 age 1 max 20 hello 2 fdelay 15 15:24:48.037569 IP 172.24.0.7.domain > 172.18.117.18.46665: 59092 2/7/6 CNAME[|domain]

So I think we did a bit of TCP chatter then no UDP at all?

Looks that way, and on top if it got no results back from netserver on the control (TCP, port 12865) connection. Adding some -d's to the global options will cause netperf to regurgitate what messages it is sending and such.

I'd have expected that even if no UDP traffic could flow between netperf and netserver the timer running in the netserver _should_ have gotten it out of the recv()/recvfrom() call in recv_udp_rr() (src/nettest_bsd.c) and that netperf would then report a "normal" result of just 0 transactions per second.

Either that timer didn't get set, didn't fire, or was insufficient to get netserver out of that recv() on the UDP socket, or comms between the two system got fubar for TCP too.

rick jones


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to