On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 11:38:13 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote: > > Is there a chance someone could look into adding annotations to socket > > locking? > > Annotating lock_sock_fast()/unlock_sock_fast() as they would > unconditionally acquire/release the socket spinlock removes the warning > related to fast lock - at least for me;). > > Hopefully that does not interact with lockdep, but perhpas is a bit too > extreme/rusty?
I'm not a sparse expert, do we need both __acquire and __acquires? Would you mind submitting officially and CCing the sparse ML?
