From: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> The two are the same, but for blackhole nexthops we will not have an associated neighbour struct, so resolve the RIF from the nexthop struct itself instead.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <[email protected]> --- drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c index 53d04e7993f6..ef0e4e452f47 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c @@ -3284,7 +3284,7 @@ static int __mlxsw_sp_nexthop_update(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, u32 adj_index, mlxsw_reg_ratr_pack(ratr_pl, MLXSW_REG_RATR_OP_WRITE_WRITE_ENTRY, true, MLXSW_REG_RATR_TYPE_ETHERNET, - adj_index, neigh_entry->rif); + adj_index, nh->rif->rif_index); mlxsw_reg_ratr_eth_entry_pack(ratr_pl, neigh_entry->ha); if (nh->counter_valid) mlxsw_reg_ratr_counter_pack(ratr_pl, nh->counter_index, true); -- 2.28.0
