On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 11:17 PM Zhang Qilong <zhangqilo...@huawei.com> wrote: > > In the pm_runtime_resume_and_get, pm_runtime_resume() is > synchronous. Caller had to look into the implementation > to verify that a change for pm_runtime_resume_and_get [0].
Well, "resume" is "sync" by definition. > So we use pm_rauntime_resume_and_get_sync to replace it to > avoid making the same mistake while fixing > pm_runtime_get_sync. No, we are not making this change. Thanks!
