> Which worked _very_ well (the whole list) going in the other direction for the > netisr queue(s) in HP-UX 10.20. OK, I promise no more old HP-UX stories for the > balance of the week :)
Yes, OSes I worked on in other lives usually took the whole queue and then took responsibility for handling them outside the lock. A dequeue_n() under 1 lock should still be better than n locks, I'd think, since you may bounce to different CPUs during the n individual cycles. +-DLS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html