Please put the maintainers or the list thru which you expect the patch
to be applied in the To: field of your emails.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:05:40 +0100 Loic Poulain wrote:
> + if (proto && proto->tx_fixup) {
> + skb = proto->tx_fixup(mhi_netdev, skb);
> + if (unlikely(!skb))
> + goto exit_drop;
> + }
> @@ -170,7 +193,11 @@ static void mhi_net_dl_callback(struct mhi_device
> *mhi_dev,
> }
>
> skb_put(skb, mhi_res->bytes_xferd);
> - netif_rx(skb);
> +
> + if (proto && proto->rx_fixup)
> + proto->rx_fixup(mhi_netdev, skb);
> + else
> + netif_rx(skb);
> }
There us a slight asymmetry between tx_fixup and rx_fixup.
tx_fixup just massages the frame and then mhi_net still takes
care of transmission. On Rx side rx_fixup actually does the
netif_rx(skb). Maybe s/rx_fixup/rx/ ?
