Cong Wang wrote: > From: Cong Wang <[email protected]> > > I was planning to reuse BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_VERDICT but its name is > confusing and more importantly it seems kTLS relies on it to deliver > sk_msg too. To avoid messing up kTLS, we can just reuse the stream > verdict code but introduce a new type of eBPF program, skb_verdict. > Users are not allowed to set stream_verdict and skb_verdict at the > same time. > > Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> > Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> > Cc: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> > Cc: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <[email protected]>
I think it will be better if we can keep the same name. Does it break kTLS somehow? I'm not seeing it with a quick scan. We can always alias a better name with the same value for readability.
