On Mon,  8 Feb 2021 10:59:54 +0000 (UTC)
Kalle Valo <[email protected]> wrote:

> samirweng1979 <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > From: wengjianfeng <[email protected]>
> > 
> > -ENOMEM has been used as a return value,it is not necessary to
> > assign it, and if kzalloc fail,not need free it,so just return
> > -ENOMEM when kzalloc fail.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng <[email protected]>
> 
> You sent the previous version just five days ago:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/[email protected]/
> 
> We maintainers are busy and usually takes some time to review the
> patch. So please avoid resending patches in such short intervals.
> 
> Patch set to Superseded.
> 

Hi Kalle,
  I see, thanks your reply.

Reply via email to