KK, On Fri, 2007-08-06 at 17:01 +0530, Krishna Kumar2 wrote:
> I thought it comes to 1.147Mpps, or did I calculate wrong > (70*1024*1024/8/8) ? I assumed 8B to mean data that is on top of TCP/UDP? If so then in the case of UDP we have 8B UDP header, 20B IP and 14B ethernet < 64B minimal allowed Ethernet packet; so it gets padded and goes out as 64B. There are, as you state above, 1.147(or is it 1.48?) such packets/sec in 1Gbps. So (70Mbps/1000Mbps)*1.147 is the rough number i was reffering to. > My script was doing that earlier, I trimmed all that to make it easier > to understand. Will post the larger version later. That will be nice because remember we can have multiple CPU packet producers but only one CPU consumer. > > no problem. > > Thanks, please let me know what you think of the patch I sent earlier. I havent seen a patch. Can you resend it? > I am running a larger 5 iteration run with buffer sizes :8,32,128,512,1 > K,4K,16K. > It is going to run for around 12 hours and since I am moving house during > the > weekend, I will be able to look at the results only on Monday. > sounds good. cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
