From: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>

There's only one subflow involving the non-zero id address, but there
may be multi subflows involving the id 0 address.

Here's an example:

 local_id=0, remote_id=0
 local_id=1, remote_id=0
 local_id=0, remote_id=1

If the removing address id is 0, all the subflows involving the id 0
address need to be removed.

In mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received/mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received, the
"break" prevents the iteration to the next subflow, so this patch
dropped them.

Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]>
---
 net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
index 73b9245c87b2..87a6133fd778 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -621,8 +621,6 @@ static void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_addr_received(struct mptcp_sock 
*msk)
                        WRITE_ONCE(msk->pm.accept_addr, true);
 
                        __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RMADDR);
-
-                       break;
                }
        }
 }
@@ -695,8 +693,6 @@ void mptcp_pm_nl_rm_subflow_received(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
                        msk->pm.subflows--;
 
                        __MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), MPTCP_MIB_RMSUBFLOW);
-
-                       break;
                }
        }
 }
-- 
2.31.1

Reply via email to