Am 04.04.21 um 02:16 schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2021 at 01:48:43PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
>> Make sure that all external port are actually isolated from each other,
>> so no packets are leaked.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rem...@pengutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c | 145 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 143 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
>> index 9a5035b2f0ff..a3de3598fbf5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/qca/ar9331.c
>> @@ -60,10 +60,19 @@
>>
>> /* MIB registers */
>> #define AR9331_MIB_COUNTER(x) (0x20000 + ((x) *
>> 0x100))
>>
>> @@ -229,6 +278,7 @@ struct ar9331_sw_priv {
>> struct regmap *regmap;
>> struct reset_control *sw_reset;
>> struct ar9331_sw_port port[AR9331_SW_PORTS];
>> + int cpu_port;
>> };
>>
>> static struct ar9331_sw_priv *ar9331_sw_port_to_priv(struct ar9331_sw_port
>> *port)
>> @@ -371,12 +421,72 @@ static int ar9331_sw_mbus_init(struct ar9331_sw_priv
>> *priv)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -static int ar9331_sw_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> +static int ar9331_sw_setup_port(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>> {
>> struct ar9331_sw_priv *priv = (struct ar9331_sw_priv *)ds->priv;
>> struct regmap *regmap = priv->regmap;
>> + u32 port_mask, port_ctrl, val;
>> int ret;
>>
>> + /* Generate default port settings */
>> + port_ctrl = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE,
>> + AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_PORT_STATE_DISABLED);
>> +
>> + if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port)) {
>> + /*
>> + * CPU port should be allowed to communicate with all user
>> + * ports.
>> + */
>> + //port_mask = dsa_user_ports(ds);
>
> Code commented out should ideally not be part of a submitted patch.
Sorry I overlooked this one
> And the networking comment style is:
>
> /* CPU port should be allowed to communicate with all user
> * ports.
> */
Aaa... networking part of kernel code...
>> + port_mask = 0;
>> + /*
>> + * Enable atheros header on CPU port. This will allow us
>> + * communicate with each port separately
>> + */
>> + port_ctrl |= AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_HEAD_EN;
>> + port_ctrl |= AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_LEARN_EN;
>> + } else if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, port)) {
>> + /*
>> + * User ports should communicate only with the CPU port.
>> + */
>> + port_mask = BIT(priv->cpu_port);
>
> For all you care, the CPU port here is dsa_to_port(ds, port)->cpu_dp->index,
> no need to go to those lengths in order to find it. DSA does not have
> fixed number for the CPU port but a CPU port pointer per port in order
> to not close the door for the future support of multiple CPU ports.
ok.
>> + /* Enable unicast address learning by default */
>> + port_ctrl |= AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_LEARN_EN
>> + /* IGMP snooping seems to work correctly, let's use it */
>> + | AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_IGMP_MLD_EN
>
> I don't really like this ad-hoc enablement of IGMP/MLD snooping from the
> driver,
> please add the pass-through in DSA for SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_BRIDGE_MC_DISABLED
> (dsa_slave_port_attr_set, dsa_port_switchdev_sync, dsa_port_switchdev_unsync
> should all call a dsa_switch_ops :: port_snoop_igmp_mld function) and then
> toggle this bit from there.
sounds good. Looks like there are few more driver need to be fixed:
drivers/net/dsa/lan9303-core.c
drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
>
>> + | AR9331_SW_PORT_CTRL_SINGLE_VLAN_EN;
>> + } else {
>> + /* Other ports do not need to communicate at all */
>> + port_mask = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + val = FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_8021Q_MODE,
>> + AR9331_SW_8021Q_MODE_NONE) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_MEMBER, port_mask) |
>> + FIELD_PREP(AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID,
>> + AR9331_SW_PORT_VLAN_PORT_VID_DEF);
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_VLAN(port), val);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto error;
>> +
>> + ret = regmap_write(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_PORT_CTRL(port), port_ctrl);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto error;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +error:
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(priv->dev, "%s: error: %i\n", __func__, ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ar9331_sw_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> +{
>> + struct ar9331_sw_priv *priv = (struct ar9331_sw_priv *)ds->priv;
>> + struct regmap *regmap = priv->regmap;
>> + int ret, i;
>> +
>> ret = ar9331_sw_reset(priv);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> @@ -390,7 +500,8 @@ static int ar9331_sw_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>>
>> /* Do not drop broadcast frames */
>> ret = regmap_write_bits(regmap, AR9331_SW_REG_FLOOD_MASK,
>> - AR9331_SW_FLOOD_MASK_BROAD_TO_CPU,
>> + AR9331_SW_FLOOD_MASK_BROAD_TO_CPU
>> + | AR9331_SW_FLOOD_MASK_MULTI_FLOOD_DP,
>> AR9331_SW_FLOOD_MASK_BROAD_TO_CPU);
>> if (ret)
>> goto error;
>> @@ -402,6 +513,36 @@ static int ar9331_sw_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> if (ret)
>> goto error;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * Configure the ARL:
>> + * AR9331_SW_AT_ARP_EN - why?
>> + * AR9331_SW_AT_LEARN_CHANGE_EN - why?
>> + */
>
> Good question, why?
I still do not know if it is a good idea. This bits are enabled by
default. May be you can help me understand it. Datasheet says:
ARP_EN:
ARP frame acknowledge enable. Setting this bit to 1 is an
acknowledgement by the hardware of a received ARP frame and allows it
to be copied to the CPU port.
LEARN_CHANGE_EN:
0 - If a hash violation occurs during learning, no new address will be
learned in the ARL
1 - Enables a new MAC address change if a hash violation occurs
during learning
--
Regards,
Oleksij
