From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@nvidia.com>
Test that all the nexthops are flushed when a multi-part nexthop dump is
required for the flushing.
Without previous patch:
# ./fib_nexthops.sh
TEST: Large scale nexthop flushing [FAIL]
With previous patch:
# ./fib_nexthops.sh
TEST: Large scale nexthop flushing [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <pe...@nvidia.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh | 15 +++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
index 56dd0c6f2e96..49774a8a7736 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_nexthops.sh
@@ -1933,6 +1933,21 @@ basic()
log_test $? 2 "Nexthop group and blackhole"
$IP nexthop flush >/dev/null 2>&1
+
+ # Test to ensure that flushing with a multi-part nexthop dump works as
+ # expected.
+ local batch_file=$(mktemp)
+
+ for i in $(seq 1 $((64 * 1024))); do
+ echo "nexthop add id $i blackhole" >> $batch_file
+ done
+
+ $IP -b $batch_file
+ $IP nexthop flush >/dev/null 2>&1
+ [[ $($IP nexthop | wc -l) -eq 0 ]]
+ log_test $? 0 "Large scale nexthop flushing"
+
+ rm $batch_file
}
check_nexthop_buckets_balance()
--
2.30.2
